HOME Media Kit Advertising Contact Us About Us

 

Web The Truth


Community Calendar

Dear Ryan

Classifieds

Online Issues

Send a Letter to the Editor


 

 
 

NFHA and 19 Civil Rights Groups File HUD Complaint Over Neglected Foreclosures

Special to The Truth

Last week, the National Fair Housing Alliance (NFHA), the Toledo Fair Housing Center, and 18 local fair housing organizations announced the filing with HUD of a housing discrimination complaint against Fannie Mae, one of the largest owners of foreclosed homes in the United States.  The civil rights groups allege that Fannie Mae maintains and markets its foreclosures (also known as real estate owned or “REO” properties) in White neighborhoods consistently better than in middle- and working-class African American and Latino neighborhoods, a practice that violates the federal Fair Housing Act.  The complaint is the result of a five-year investigation.

“Fannie Mae is wreaking havoc on middle- and working-class communities of color nationwide through a pattern of neglect that is frankly appalling,” said Shanna L. Smith, President and CEO of NFHA.  “Fannie Mae’s failure to take care of its massive foreclosure inventory in African American and Latino neighborhoods further destabilizes the communities hardest hit by the foreclosure crisis, in clear contradiction of its congressional charter, federal fair housing laws, and its obligation to affirmatively further fair housing.  This systematic failure also creates health and safety hazards, contributes to blight, and places an unfair burden on neighbors and city governments to clean up the problem.”

Evidence gathered from 2010 through April 2015 documents an ongoing pattern and practice of discrimination by Fannie Mae and its asset management contractors.  Currently, NFHA and its partners have investigated 2,106 REO properties owned by Fannie Mae in 34 metropolitan areas encompassing 129 cities across the United States.  NFHA is joined in this complaint by 19 of its member organizations (see Table 1 for a full list of metro regions and fair housing organizations involved in the complaint). 

The fair housing organizations investigated the maintenance and marketing of REOs for 39 different types of deficiencies that affect home value, curb appeal, the security of the home and the marketability of the property.  The deficiencies assessed by investigators include:  broken, boarded or damaged windows and doors; unlocked doors and windows; damaged and obstructed gutters and downspouts; safety hazards; accumulated trash; overgrown lawns and shrubs; lack of “for sale” signs; and others.

Fannie Mae properties in communities of color had broken doors and windows, unlocked doors and windows allowing access to the home, excessive litter, dead or overgrown lawns, dead animals or live animals on the property, and other major deficiencies.  Conversely, most Fannie Mae properties in predominantly White communities did not.  These problems are simple to fix and are the responsibility of Fannie Mae and its contractors.

“Neighborhoods of color were the first to be targeted by predatory lenders who stripped the equity and sent the homes into foreclosure,” said Michael P. Marsh, president and CEO of the Toledo Fair Housing Center. “These neighborhoods now are the victims of neglected real estate owned, foreclosed homes that Fannie Mae owns. Fannie has a responsibility to maintain and market the homes they own in all neighborhoods. They, however, do a lousy job in neighborhoods of color. If they can keep their homes well maintained in predominantly white communities, why can't they do the same in neighborhoods of color? Fannie Mae continues to play a role in the devastation of the aftermath of the foreclosure crisis. Now it is time for Fannie to provide community relief to these neighborhoods to improve conditions and stabilize property values.

Since 2009, NFHA has made efforts to work with the Government Sponsored Enterprises (“GSEs”) to correct their practices.  The GSEs have a legal responsibility to treat all neighborhoods fairly.  Smith said, “Freddie Mac looked into its practices and made good faith efforts to correct its business model, but Fannie Mae refused to take responsibility for its neglect in communities of color.  The difference between Freddie and Fannie properties is striking.  We now rarely find disparities in Freddie Mac’s inventory.  Fannie has to take responsibility.”  She added, "Fannie Mae has not only ignored the problem but has continued to award millions of dollars in new contracts to the same asset management companies that engaged in this discriminatory behavior.  We have filed this complaint after having exhausted every possible means we could think of to get Fannie Mae to abide by the law and work with us to re-stabilize the damaged communities.”

The Fair Housing Act makes it illegal to discriminate based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, disability, or familial status, as well as on the race or national origin of residents of a neighborhood.  This law applies to housing and housing-related activities, which includes the maintenance, appraisal, listing, marketing, and selling of homes.

 

NATIONWIDE STATISTICS

Full national statistics and data for individual cities available at www.nationalfairhousing.org

Summary of Findings:

  • 49.5 percent of the REO properties in white communities had fewer than five deficiencies, while only 24.4 percent of the REO properties in communities of color had fewer than five deficiencies.
  • 22.1 percent of the REO properties in communities of color had 10 or more deficiencies, while only 8.0 percent of the REO properties in predominantly white communities had 10 or more deficiencies

Highlights of Significant Racial Disparities:

  • 40.6 percent of the REO properties in communities of color had a broken, boarded, or unsecured window, while only 21.2 percent of the REO properties in white communities had the same problem.
  • 38.5 percent of the REO properties in communities of color had trash or debris on the premises, while only 15.1 percent of the REO properties in white communities had the same problem.
  • 29.8 percent of the REO properties in communities of color had holes in the structure of the home, while only 13.9 percent of the REO properties in white communities had the same problem.
  • 27.3 percent of the REO properties in communities of color had wood rot, while only 17.8 percent of the REO properties in white communities had the same problem.
  • 23.9 percent of the REO properties in communities of color had unsecured, broken, or boarded doors, while only 11.6 percent of the REO properties in white communities had the same problem.
  • 21.7 percent of the REO properties in communities of color had exposed or tampered-with utilities, while only 9.7 percent of the REO properties in white communities had the same problem.

Summary of Findings in Toledo, Ohio Metropolitan Area:

  • Investigation
    • In the Toledo, OH metropolitan area, the Toledo Fair Housing Center investigated 110 REOs owned by Fannie Mae.
      • 38 located in African-American communities
      • 2 located in non-white communities
      • 70 located in white communities
    • 34 percent of the REOs in white communities had fewer than five maintenance or marketing deficiencies documented, while only 7.5 percent of the REO properties in communities of color had fewer than 5 deficiencies.
    • 40 percent of the REOs in communities of color had 10 or more maintenance or marketing deficiencies documented, while only 12.9 percent of the REOs in white communities had 10 or more maintenance or marketing deficiencies. 
  • Racial Disparities
    • 32.5 percent of the Fannie Mae REOs in communities of color had trash or debris on the premises, while only 5.7 percent of the REOs in white communities did.
    • 35 percent of the REOs in communities of color had an unsecured, broken, or boarded door, while only 12.9 percent of the REOs in white communities did.
    • 68 percent of the REOs in communities of color had a broken, boarded, or unsecured window, while only 29 percent of the REOs in white communities did.
    • 10 percent of the REO properties in communities of color had graffiti, while none of the REOs in white communities did.
    • 48 percent of the REOs in communities of color had missing or out of place gutters, while only 21 percent of the REO properties in white communities did.
 
   
   


Copyright © 2015 by [The Sojourner's Truth]. All rights reserved.
Revised: 08/16/18 14:12:25 -0700.


More Articles....

Reconciling Black Generational Estrangement

Rep. Ashford Announces Funding for Developmental Disabilities Services, Corrections Facility Upgrades in Toledo

St. Paul’s Family Reunion Kicks off Upcoming Centennial

 

Mayor Paula Hicks-Hudson’s Campaign Gets Boost with Support from Community Groups

Corruption Officer by Gary L. Heyward

Indiana Avenue MBC’s Senior Citizen Weekend


 


   

Back to Home Page

 

 

 

Copyright © 2014 The Sojourner's Truth. All Rights Reserved.