HOME Media Kit Advertising Contact Us About Us

 

Web The Truth


Community Calendar

Dear Ryan

Classifieds

Online Issues

Send a Letter to the Editor


 

 
 

Regional Water Community Discussion Raises Many Questions, Offers Few Answers

By Fletcher Word
Sojourner’s Truth Editor

The second of six community discussions about a proposed regional water distribution plan was held on Thursday night, March 15 at the Sanger Branch Library. The meeting, organized by the City of Toledo, brought out a standing-room only crowd to listen to the details of the proposed Toledo Area Water Authority (TAWA). On hand to explain the proposal was Eric Rothstein, the self-described independent utility advisor, hired by the Toledo Area Chamber of Commerce to guide Toledo and surrounding communities in the discussion about forming a TAWA. The standing-room only crowd asked a number of questions about the proposal. They received few concrete answers and one very big threat.

The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) regarding the TAWA, which was signed by Toledo Mayor Wade Kapszukiewicz and representatives of Maumee, Sylvania, Perrysburg, Sylvania, Whitehouse, the Northwestern Water and Sewer District and Monroe, Fulton and Lucas counties, was completed in January 2018 and is now in its 13 version after several years of discussion. This version, said Kapszukiewicz, will be placed on a ballot in the near future for Toledo voters to approve or reject.

The MUO calls for, among other items, the TAWA to purchase the Toledo water system whose replacement value is estimated at $1.3 billion for a maximum of $360 million at $12 million for year over 30 years at “net present value.” That clause means that the effective worth of the buyout would be for less than $200 million as estimated by some observers such as Democratic gubernatorial candidate Dennis Kucinich.

Additionally the MUO calls for a board of trustees to operate the facility and determine rates for Toledo and the other participating communities. The board would have only two designees from Toledo.

Among the many questions posed at the community discussion, several were repeated and garnered special interest on the part of the audience: What are the compelling business reasons to move towards this type of regionalism? What will the rates be with and without this move? Why only two of seven board positions for Toledo? What is the rush? What happens to the current Public Utility water treatment employees; will they keep their jobs?

The audience was told by Rothstein that water rates would be equalized – meaning they will go up for Toledoans and down for those in the outlying townships, but the rates would not go up for Toledoans as much as if they would if the surrounding towns that now buy their water from Toledo went elsewhere to buy their water. The debt on the water plant – currently around $300 million, he said, would be assumed by TAWA. And, of course, suburban cooperation would be enhanced, he assured the audience.

Toledo would receive only two seats because of a “desire to break from past practices to avoid a blocking vote,” he said. Such a structure would promote regional cooperation.

Ed Moore, director of the Department of Public Utilities, assured attendees that employee jobs will be safe.

What’s the rush? The rush to accept the TAWA and put it for a vote on November’s ballot is to assure the several communities whose contracts with Toledo end within six years that they can start to make plans immediately to either stay with TAWA or go off on their own. If they do decide to go off on their own and seek other water supplies, such a process is a lengthy one, said Rothstein.

With this came the big threat.

The current MUO is the 13th one produced in this process and work on version 14, said Rothstein, begins shortly. Version 14 will be an examination of a water authority that includes all those in version 13 with the notable exception of the City of Toledo. That possibility, he noted, could mean that Toledo, operating on its own without suburban customers, would be forced to increase its rates for city residents by as much as 300 percent.

Unfortunately such a statement is only a estimate since an extensive analysis of rates has not been performed; neither has a thorough appraisal of the value of the Toledo water system. Both will presumably be performed after the MOU is accepted by Toledo through a vote in November. Then, at some point in the future, Toledoans will have the opportunity to learn what they voted to approve.

 
   
   


Copyright © 2018 by [The Sojourner's Truth]. All rights reserved.
Revised: 08/16/18 14:12:13 -0700.


More Articles....

House School Safety Bill Wrong Approach to the Problem

Why Is the City of Toledo Interested in Selling Its Most Precious Investment?

NAACP: The Struggle Continues

Democratic Lawmakers Announce $15 Minimum Wage Bill

All the Women in My Family Sing, edited by Deborah Santana


 


   

Back to Home Page

 

 

 

Copyright © The Sojourner's Truth. All Rights Reserved.