HOME Media Kit Advertising Contact Us About Us

 

Web The Truth


Community Calendar

Dear Ryan

Classifieds

Online Issues

Send a Letter to the Editor


 

 
 

Washington or Du Bois, Then and Now

By Megan Banks, UT Student
Guest Column

Booker T. Washington and W.E.B Du Bois were the two major African-American leaders, educators and spokesmen during the late 1800’s and early 1900’s. They held opposing yet highly-influential positions on what the newly-freed African Americans should do as far as acquiring education and civil rights/status. 

Washington asserted in his Atlanta Exposition that Negroes should “Cast their buckets down where they are” (Tozer, p.116) in agriculture, mechanics, commerce, domestic service and in the professions, rather than seek a broad and higher level education. 

He also discouraged blacks from seeking civil and social equality and, instead, encouraged them to focus on economic stability to earn respect from whites. 
 


Megan Banks

In contrast to Washington, Du Bois held the belief that blacks can only assure that they can make progress if they have the opportunities for a broad education, civil and social rights, and the right to vote.  While Washington’s stance was more practical for making some immediate progress during the reformation era, Du Bois’s argument was much more realistic for making true and meaningful progress for African Americans.

             Du Bois asserted that in order to make any type of gains in society, black people had to actively try to gain the right to vote. The right to vote, he argued, is extremely powerful when trying to make collective economic and social gains.  Even if there is passion and organization, in order to achieve anything on a level that is to be recognized by the general (and at the time, dissenting) public, one must have the right of suffrage and exercise this right. 

Du Bois spoke about this in The Souls of Black Folk in a response to Washington’s Atlanta Exposition, writing “…it is utterly impossible, under modern competitive methods, for workingmen and property owners to defend their rights and exist without suffrage.” (Tozer, p. 118)  Gaining economic and material wealth would mean nothing for the reformation era blacks if they did not wield and use any political power.

The other main tenants of Du Bois’s argument were that blacks also needed civil equality and a broad base of education.  Civil equality is necessary to allow free movement in social class, as promised by the American dream. 

At the time in the South, there were laws that created “a distinct status of civil inferiority for the Negro.” (Tozer, p. 121 from Du Bois’s The Souls of Black Folk). These laws justified anti-black sentiments by giving them legal backing. This status also effectively prevented blacks from accessing pretty much any quality education, let alone higher education. 

Washington argued that blacks should only receive technical education to prepare them for the roles that society had prescribed for them (in agriculture and domestic service and commerce).  Du Bois, in my opinion, weakened this argument with simple logic.  He says, “Neither the Negro common-schools, nor Tuskegee itself could remain open a day were it not for teachers trained in Negro colleges, or trained by their graduates.” (Tozer, p.121)

The true value of W.E.B. Du Bois’s views is that they still prove to be useful today. He advocated for the education of students based on ability level. This idea is seen in the push towards diverse education based on student needs and the implementing of tracking in schools. 

There are drawbacks to this theory however because students of lower socio-economic class (which is often tied to race) are tracked into vocational programs in disproportionate amounts. Do all of these students lack the ability to survive in higher level and intellectually challenging courses? What is the process that the school is uses to determine which students are tracked in which programs?

Another way in which Du Bois’s views are still relevant can be seen when examining immigrant families. Civil equality and the right to vote play a crucial role in having a voice in the education of your youth.  There has been widespread xenophobic antipathy toward Hispanic immigrants which has caused numerous problems when trying to address the issue of educating the children of these migrant groups.  Considering that they have quickly become the largest minority group in the U.S., it would benefit them to be able to weigh in on the education of their children by voting. 

Past or present, I believe that Du Bois had a much more realistic and solid argument about how marginalized groups should seek advancement.  Whereas Washington’s argument merely sought to put a band-aid on the symptoms that slavery and discrimination that caused, Du Bois sought to cure the ills by attacking the problems directly.

Reference(s)

Tozer, S., & Senese, G. (2009). Educational Aims in Historical Perspective. In School and Society: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives (6th ed., p. 116-121). Boston: McGraw-Hill.

 Megan Banks is a senior at the University of Toledo Judith Herb College of Education majoring in music education. Ms. Banks is Drum Major for the 2014-2015 University of Toledo Marching Band, and in that position is making history as the first Black female to hold that position in Rocket history. 

 

 

   
   


Copyright © 2014 by [The Sojourner's Truth]. All rights reserved.
Revised: 08/16/18 14:12:25 -0700.


More Articles....

Five Things Families with College Bound Students Should Consider

Washington or Du Bois, Then and Now

Tips to Boost Baby and Toddler  Brain Development

School Choice Ohio Applauds Gov. Kasich´s Proposal for Expanding Access to School Choice


 


   

Back to Home Page

 

 

 

Copyright © 2014 The Sojourner's Truth. All Rights Reserved.