HOME Media Kit Advertising Contact Us About Us

 

Web The Truth


Community Calendar

Dear Ryan

Classifieds

Online Issues

Send a Letter to the Editor


 

 
 

Sandy Spang’s Baptism of Fire and Water

By Rev. Donald L. Perryman, D.Min.
The Truth Contributor

There is no short cut to utopia
                  - Claude McKay
.


 

Rev. Donald L. Perryman, D.Min.

The show of hands for support of the proposed regional water plan currently consists of a mere two city council members who can actually be considered as rock solid. Meanwhile, Toledoans are looking to council members for guidance prior to the issue going on the November 2018 general election ballot.

Councilwoman Sandy Spang is one of the two proponents of the plan that proposes to shift governance and operation of Toledo’s wholly-owned water plant to a shared regional authority with representation from other municipalities from Wood, Monroe and Lucas County.

I caught up with Spang at Plate One, her chic, newly opened downtown coffee shop to discus her policy views on regional water and other contentious issues taking place simultaneously with her campaign for Lucas County Commissioner. This is part one of our two-part conversation.

Spang: If council says regional water is a good deal, then voters will believe that it’s a good deal, so I am deeply concerned about where we are on the issue. Recently, in Sylvania City Council, they formally requested that a second MOU be developed, that includes all of the players except Toledo.  They’re not playing chicken.  And here’s the thing, many people moved out of our city and thought it was a good thing.  I hear people on the radio say oh yeah, I gave up on Toledo and I moved out.  However, they need to care about what happens in this city because we’re all in this together and this is powerfully important beyond even water.

Perryman: Well, my concern is what happens to the income-challenged, a class of people which has continued to increase.  We have been losing the black middleclass and black working class with churches, from my perspective, being the proverbial canary in the coalmine.  Many churches, formerly supported wholly or in part, by middleclass and working class African Americans, are closing or going into foreclosure in record numbers. So, I’m concerned about the impact that regionalization might have on every day black and brown people and distressed over the possible unintended consequences upon those who navigate the “real world” of racial and income inequality.

Spang:  Well I think the fundamental question is do we close in or do we open up? That is really the question.  We have the children of those people who fled to the suburbs for the schools and the big houses and who had the ability to separate themselves from the city, and what are their children now doing?  They’re moving back into the city. They want to live downtown. They want to live in the city.  In the case of water, we want as many people as possible paying for the product to bring the cost down and then that one percent set aside for low-income customers. 

Perryman: Also important is whether the people’s voices will be heard to ensure that the TAWA [Toledo Area Water Authority] is held accountable and if the people will have a voice in helping to shape some of TAWA’s policies and practices. By “people,” I mean those from urban areas, which tend to have larger proportions of minority residents than the suburban districts.

Spang: I think those who have the community’s interests at heart will look at this thing and say Toledo, on their own, is never going to be able to replace its lead lines in our lifetimes. However, participants, like Monroe County don’t have a single lead line because their system is too new. But if the MOU is honored, they’re going to participate in the replacement of our lead lines.  That’s a big deal. 

Now the wording on the lead says that TAWA is required to annually put in two percent of the cost of the lead replacement, which would allow us to move forward on a steady basis with the lead replacement.  It also says that lead mitigation could be as little as doing what Toledo already does, which is to coat the interiors of the lines, which is necessary to do until replacement can happen. But the idea that we could replace our lead lines and never be a Flint, that hope is in the agreement and there’s no hope if we stay by ourselves and lose our customers. It cannot happen under the go-alone scenario because there won’t be the resources and the one percent set aside for the low-income person.  Those are the pieces that mean something to low-income people.  The third piece would be the idea that the more customers you have, the better your pricing will be.  And the truth is, the citizens of Toledo are going to pay more for their water, that’s a fact, but…

Perryman: Won’t costs go up under either scenario?

Spang:  Either way, so why not at least be hopeful that we can live with those.  So I will be excited to see what (an independent expert) comes up with, because I think that their findings could be a huge piece in the public vote.  Also, if there are going to be changes in the MOU framework, it would need to not come from council members saying I’m not going to negotiate with a gun to my head. It would, rather, have to come from a respected community partner that is based in fact. We need to know from real data, whether this is good or bad for low-income citizens, similar to the process that was done in Detroit.

On the other hand, we need to determine if TAWA stabilizes rates long term. If we leave water uncertainty, we’re going to have an economic development nightmare.  Businesses want long-term water stability.  There have been some studies done that have shown it is not how low the rates are, it’s how stable the system is that often influences economic development.  They want it to be plentiful water for a long time and that’s a big piece of it, so I’m concerned.  I don’t like the direction things are currently heading and I don’t like the tone that council is adopting at this point.

Perryman: Ok, let’s jump to another subject.  How do you feel about the jail site?

Spang: What are your thoughts?

Perryman: After all is said and done, these type issues always seem to unfairly end up in black or brown neighborhoods because no one else wants them in their neighborhoods. I think that there should be more political equity in neighborhoods of color vis á vis that which exists in more privileged areas.

Spang: The levy for the jail will be a large one. If you own a quarter million dollar home in Sylvania Township, you’ll be paying $10 a month for the jail, so that is likely to not happen.  But the county is trying to get operating costs in, and they’re trying to recoup what they lost from the City of Toledo and I get that.  That was a big hit.  It was a $12 million hit and it’s not likely coming back to them. The opposition to the Detroit/Alexis Road site is nothing like the opposition at the Angola site.  But I just saw now that Michigan’s getting into the game.  This is ridiculous because it will have a negative impact on a big investment into the community.

Perryman: But part of the investment goes towards mental health, a piece which desperately needs to be incorporated into criminal justice reform. 

Spang:  Well, Lucas County has already made good strides in that regard.  Their criminal justice reform has already brought down the rate of recidivism and they’ve brought down the number of those being incarcerated. I just think the levy is going to be a pretty heavy lift.

Perryman: So speaking of the Lucas County Commissioners, how are you going to coexist with a majority Democratic board should your campaign be successful? 

Spang:  Well, I coexisted with a majority Democratic city council and I’ve done okay. And with fewer people to work with on the board of commissioners, I think the conversation will be different than it has been.

Perryman: Talk about the conversation.

Spang:  Well, Pete [Gerken] already calls me about things and I feel that I can speak my mind. I’m a very persuasive person and my theory about Pete is that he’s a true idealist.  He wants to fix things.  I don’t always agree with Pete’s methodology and that’s probably where I think I’ll be able to sometimes temper the message. 

The main thing is that Gerken cares. But just because you care doesn’t mean that you get the conversation right and that you know the right way to put it.  I think people who know me well know that I care deeply about all kinds of issues that our city is facing. Do I always phrase it correctly?  That can be tough, and I think that sometimes, maybe because the commissioners tend to always agree and get a lot of things done behind the curtain, that their skills are not as well-honed in taking something to the people. So I think I’m going to be able to be helpful there.  I think I bring fresh ideas.

Contact Rev. Donald Perryman, D.Min, at drdlperryman@centerofhopebaptist.org

 

 
  

Copyright © 2018 by [The Sojourner's Truth]. All rights reserved.
Revised: 08/16/18 14:12:13 -0700.

 

 


More Articles....

Sandy Spang’s Baptism of Fire and Water

We Have No King But Caesar!

Over Policing the African-American Community

Fedor: Arming Students Better Saved for Oppressive Foreign Regimes – not America

House School Safety Bill Wrong Approach to the Problem


 


   

Back to Home Page